本文已被:浏览 2033次 下载 1769次
投稿时间:2022-04-11 修订日期:2022-04-19 录用日期:2022-04-21 网络发布日期:2022-07-13
投稿时间:2022-04-11 修订日期:2022-04-19 录用日期:2022-04-21 网络发布日期:2022-07-13
中文摘要: 以人造金刚石废触媒的硫酸浸出液为基础,采用L16(45)正交试验方案,在1 200 C恒定通电量下,进行直流静态电解沉积Fe-Ni合金,研究了各工艺参数对电沉积电流效率、镀层镍质量分数,以及Ni、Fe析出的分电流密度的影响规律,并以电流效率为主要指标优化得出最优工艺参数。结果表明,对电流效率影响因素由大到小的顺序为镀液pH>电流密度>温度>糖精钠浓度>硫脲浓度。最优工艺参数为平均电流密度500 A/m2、温度45 ℃、pH=3.55、糖精钠浓度3 g/L、硫脲浓度0.15 g/L。最优条件验证试验结果表明了正交试验结果的可靠性。
Abstract:Based on sulfuric acid leaching solution of spent synthetic diamond catalyst, the DC static electrolytic deposition of Fe-Ni alloy was carried out under 1 200 C constant charge by using L16(45) orthogonal experimental scheme. Effects of process parameters on electrodeposition current efficiency, nickel mass fraction and partial current density of Ni and Fe precipitation were studied, and the optimal process parameters were obtained by taking current efficiency as the main index. The results show that the order of influencing factors on current efficiency is pH value > current density > temperature > saccharin sodium concentration > thiourea concentration. The optimum process parameters include average current density of 500 A/m2, temperature of 45 ℃, pH value of 3.55, sodium saccharin concentration of 3 g/L, and thiourea concentration of 0.15 g/L. The results of optimal conditions verify the reliability of orthogonal test result.
文章编号: 中图分类号: 文献标志码:
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC1909704)
| 作者 | 单位 | |
| 冯振武 | 东北大学冶金学院 | 1556404414@qq.com |
| 路殿坤 | 东北大学冶金学院 | |
| 邹小平 | 矿冶科技集团有限公司 | |
| 谢锋* | 东北大学冶金学院 | xief@smm.neu.edu.cn |
| 符岩 | 东北大学冶金学院 |
引用文本:
冯振武,路殿坤,邹小平,谢锋,符岩.废触媒浸出液中铁镍合金的电沉积[J].有色金属(冶炼部分),2022(8):92-97.
FENG Zhen-wu,LU Dian-kun,ZOU Xiao-ping,XIE Feng,FU Yan.Electrodeposition of Fe-Ni Alloy in Waste Catalyst Leaching Solution[J].Nonferrous Metals (Extractive Metallurgy),2022(8):92-97.
冯振武,路殿坤,邹小平,谢锋,符岩.废触媒浸出液中铁镍合金的电沉积[J].有色金属(冶炼部分),2022(8):92-97.
FENG Zhen-wu,LU Dian-kun,ZOU Xiao-ping,XIE Feng,FU Yan.Electrodeposition of Fe-Ni Alloy in Waste Catalyst Leaching Solution[J].Nonferrous Metals (Extractive Metallurgy),2022(8):92-97.

关注微信公众号