###
有色金属(冶炼部分):2024,(3):125-133
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
萍水河水质空间分布特征及水质评价对比研究
章艳红1, 汪金坤1, 陈俊华2, 马文洁1, 葛 勤1, 刘 斌3
(1.东华理工大学核资源与环境国家重点实验室 水资源与环境工程学院;2.广西北投环保水务集团有限公司;3.江西复正环境科技有限公司)
Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Water Quality and Comparative Study on Water Quality Evaluation in the Pingshui River
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 1799次   下载 1314次
投稿时间:2023-11-10     修订日期:2023-11-23     录用日期:2023-11-27     网络发布日期:2024-01-26
中文摘要: 流域水质直接关系到人体健康和生态安全。以萍水河向阳湖至何雁桥段为研究对象,分析其水质空间特征,综合4种方法进行水质评价,进一步利用多元统计和级别差方法对比分析水质评价结果。结果表明:1)COD、NH3-N、TP和TN的最高浓度位于赤山桥处;上游(向阳湖-桥头村)和下游(赤山桥-何雁桥)总体水质较好,部分采样点TN、Fe和Mn轻度超标,污染程度明显弱于中游(桥头村-赤山桥)。2)最差水质级别均为Ⅴ类或劣Ⅴ类水,污染程度属严重污染及以上;单因子评价法确定总氮(TN)为首要污染指标;主成分分析法确定2个主成分,可解释为营养盐污染指标和地质沉积环境指标。3)4种方法两两之间呈显著正相关,相关系数为0.937~0.994,但水质级别表现出明显的差异性;级差法结果表明,3种综合水质评价方法的水质级别顺序为:内梅罗污染指数法<综合污染指数法<主成分分析法。研究成果可为流域水质评价工作和研究提供参考,同时为流域水资源开发利用和水环境保护及综合治理提供科学依据。
Abstract:The water quality of the river basin is directly related to human health and ecological safety. Taking section from Xiangyanghu to Heyanqiao of the Pingshui River as the research object, its spatial characteristics of water quality were analyzed, four methods were used to evaluate water quality, and multivariate statistical method and level difference method were applied to comparatively analyze the results of four commonly used assessment methods. The results show that: 1) The highest concentrations of COD, NH3-N, TP and TN are found at the sampling point No.11 (near Chishanqiao); water qualities of upstream (Xiangyang Lake-Qiaotoucun village) and downstream (Chishanqiao bridge-Heyanqiao bridge) are relatively good. Contents of TN, Fe and Mn in some sampling points slightly exceed standards, pollution degree in the middle area (Qiaotoucun village-Chishanqiao bridge) is significantly weaker than other areas. 2) The worst water quality grade is class Ⅴ or inferior class Ⅴ, with pollution degree of serious pollution and more than serious pollution; single factor evaluation method determines TN as the main pollution index, principal component analysis identifies two principal components, which can be interpreted as nutrient pollution index and geological sedimentary environment index. 3) There is a significant positive correlation between four methods, and correlation coefficients vary from 0.937 to 0.994, but it shows an obvious difference in the water quality level. The results of level difference method show that water quality grades of three comprehensive water quality evaluation methods are listed in order as follows: Nemerow pollution index method < comprehensive pollution index method < principal component analysis method. The results can provide reference for the related work and research of water quality assessment in the basin, and provide scientific basis for the development and utilization of water resources, water environment protection and comprehensive treatment in the basin.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(42107093,42062017);国家自然科学基金重点项目-核技术创新联合基金资助项目(U1967209);东华理工大学核资源与环境国家重点实验室开放基金项目(NRE1927)
引用文本:
章艳红,汪金坤,陈俊华,马文洁,葛 勤,刘 斌.萍水河水质空间分布特征及水质评价对比研究[J].有色金属(冶炼部分),2024(3):125-133.
ZHANG Yanhong,WANG Jinkun,CHEN Junhua,MA Wenjie,GE Qin,LIU Bin.Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Water Quality and Comparative Study on Water Quality Evaluation in the Pingshui River[J].Nonferrous Metals (Extractive Metallurgy),2024(3):125-133.

我们一直在努力打
造,精品期刊,传
播学术成果

全国咨询服务热线
86-10-63299752/63299758

联系我们

电话:010-63299752/63299758

传真:010-63299744

QQ:XXXXXXX

Email:ysyl@bgrimm.com

邮编:100160

地址:北京市南四环西路188号总部基地18区23号楼

关注微信公众号